Frequently Asked Question
What is the difference between masking and truncation?
Masking is addressed in PCI DSS Requirement 3.3, whereas truncation is one of several options specified to meet PCI DSS Requirement 3.4.
Requirement 3.3 relates to protection of PAN where it is displayed on screens, paper receipts, printouts, etc., and is not to be confused with Requirement 3.4 for protection of PAN when stored, processed, or transmitted in files, databases, etc.
Masking is a method of concealing a segment of a primary account number (PAN) when displayed or printed (for example, on paper receipts, reports, or computer screens), and is used when there is no business need to view the entire PAN.
Truncation is a method of rendering a full PAN unreadable by removing a segment of PAN data and applies to PANs that are electronically stored (for example, in files, databases, etc.).
Masking is not synonymous with truncation and these terms cannot be used interchangeably. Masking refers to the concealment of certain digits during display or printing, even when the entire PAN is stored on a system. This is different from truncation, in which the truncated digits are removed and cannot be retrieved within the system. Masked PAN could be 'unmasked', but there is no "un-truncation" without recreating the PAN from another source.
Note that even if a PAN is masked when displayed, the full PAN might still be electronically stored and would need to be protected in accordance with PCI DSS Requirement 3.4.
Entities should also be aware of any stricter requirements that may apply to displays of cardholder data, such as specific Payment Brand regulations and regulatory or legislative requirements —for example, restrictions for data displayed on point-of-sale (POS) receipts. PCI DSS does not supersede local or regional laws or other legislative requirements.
See also the following FAQs:
FAQ 1117: Are truncated Primary Account Numbers (PAN) required to be protected in accordance with PCI DSS?
Requirement 3.3 relates to protection of PAN where it is displayed on screens, paper receipts, printouts, etc., and is not to be confused with Requirement 3.4 for protection of PAN when stored, processed, or transmitted in files, databases, etc.
Masking is a method of concealing a segment of a primary account number (PAN) when displayed or printed (for example, on paper receipts, reports, or computer screens), and is used when there is no business need to view the entire PAN.
Truncation is a method of rendering a full PAN unreadable by removing a segment of PAN data and applies to PANs that are electronically stored (for example, in files, databases, etc.).
Masking is not synonymous with truncation and these terms cannot be used interchangeably. Masking refers to the concealment of certain digits during display or printing, even when the entire PAN is stored on a system. This is different from truncation, in which the truncated digits are removed and cannot be retrieved within the system. Masked PAN could be 'unmasked', but there is no "un-truncation" without recreating the PAN from another source.
Note that even if a PAN is masked when displayed, the full PAN might still be electronically stored and would need to be protected in accordance with PCI DSS Requirement 3.4.
Entities should also be aware of any stricter requirements that may apply to displays of cardholder data, such as specific Payment Brand regulations and regulatory or legislative requirements —for example, restrictions for data displayed on point-of-sale (POS) receipts. PCI DSS does not supersede local or regional laws or other legislative requirements.
See also the following FAQs:
FAQ 1117: Are truncated Primary Account Numbers (PAN) required to be protected in accordance with PCI DSS?
September 2021
Article Number: 1146
Featured FAQ Articles
Featured
-
Do PCI DSS requirements for keyed cryptographic hashing apply to previously hashed PANs?
-
Is the PCI DSS Attestation of Compliance intended to be shared?
-
How does an entity report the results of a PCI DSS assessment for new requirements that are noted in PCI DSS as best practices until a future date?
-
Where do I direct questions about complying with PCI standards?
-
Can SAQ eligibility criteria be used for determining applicability of PCI DSS requirements for assessments documented in a Report on Compliance?
Most Popular
-
When should an entity implement PCI DSS requirements noted as best practices until a future date?
-
For PCI DSS, can multi-factor authentication (MFA) implementations indicate the success of a factor prior to presentation of subsequent factors?
-
What is the completion date for PCI DSS assessments documented in a Report on Compliance and its related Attestations of Compliance?
-
What is the completion date for PCI DSS assessments documented in a Self-Assessment Questionnaire and its related Attestations of Compliance?
-
How does PCI DSS Requirement 6.4.3 apply to 3DS scripts called from a merchant check-out page as part of 3DS processing?
Most Recently Updated
-
How are third-party service providers (TPSPs) expected to demonstrate PCI DSS compliance for TPSP services that meet customers’ PCI DSS requirements or may impact the security of a customer’s cardholder data and/or sensitive authentication data?
-
Can SAQ eligibility criteria be used for determining applicability of PCI DSS requirements for assessments documented in a Report on Compliance?
-
What should an entity do if its PCI DSS assessment will not be complete prior to that standard's retirement date?
-
Where can I find the current version of PCI DSS?
-
When should an entity implement PCI DSS requirements noted as best practices until a future date?