Frequently Asked Question

Can a PCI 3DS Assessment result in a finding of "Compliant" if some requirements are not tested?
No. The PCI 3DS Attestation of Compliance (AOC) can only document a "Compliant" finding if all requirements are tested and found to be "In Place" or a combination of "In Place," 'In Place w/CCW' (in place with compensating controls worksheet), and/or "N/A" (not applicable). Where the assessor has marked requirements as "In Place w/CCW" or "N/A," the assessor would also need to perform appropriate testing and complete the appropriate appendixes of the PCI 3DS Report on Compliance (ROC).
Version 1.0 of the PCI 3DS ROC and AOC do not include an option to report requirements as 'not tested'. Because the assessor has not determined whether such requirements could be applicable or whether they have been met, any PCI 3DS requirements that have not been tested must be marked as "Not in Place" and the overall compliance status marked as 'Not Compliant'.
Support for "not tested" responses is planned for inclusion in a future update to the PCI 3DS ROC and AOC. Requirements identified as "not tested" would also result in a finding of 'Not Compliant'.
Related
-
How should PCI DSS v4.x requirements noted as superseded by another requirement be reported after 31 March 2025?
-
Are providers of third-party scripts for e-commerce environments considered third-party service providers for PCI DSS Requirements 12.8 and 12.9?
-
Why do requirements 8.3.9 and 8.3.10.1 focus on passwords/passphrases used for single-factor authentication, when multi-factor authentication is required for all access into the CDE?
Featured FAQ Articles
Featured
-
Do PCI DSS requirements for keyed cryptographic hashing apply to previously hashed PANs?
-
Is the PCI DSS Attestation of Compliance intended to be shared?
-
How does an entity report the results of a PCI DSS assessment for new requirements that are noted in PCI DSS as best practices until a future date?
-
Where do I direct questions about complying with PCI standards?
-
Can SAQ eligibility criteria be used for determining applicability of PCI DSS requirements for assessments documented in a Report on Compliance?
Most Popular
-
How should PCI DSS v4.x requirements noted as superseded by another requirement be reported after 31 March 2025?
-
Are providers of third-party scripts for e-commerce environments considered third-party service providers for PCI DSS Requirements 12.8 and 12.9?
-
Why do requirements 8.3.9 and 8.3.10.1 focus on passwords/passphrases used for single-factor authentication, when multi-factor authentication is required for all access into the CDE?
-
Do PCI DSS Requirements 8.3.9 and 8.3.10.1 apply to all system components?
-
Is the cardholder in scope for PCI DSS?
Most Recently Updated
-
How should PCI DSS v4.x requirements noted as superseded by another requirement be reported after 31 March 2025?
-
Are providers of third-party scripts for e-commerce environments considered third-party service providers for PCI DSS Requirements 12.8 and 12.9?
-
Why do requirements 8.3.9 and 8.3.10.1 focus on passwords/passphrases used for single-factor authentication, when multi-factor authentication is required for all access into the CDE?
-
Do PCI DSS Requirements 8.3.9 and 8.3.10.1 apply to all system components?
-
Is the cardholder in scope for PCI DSS?