Frequently Asked Question

Do PANs need to be masked on cardholder statements sent by issuers to customers?
PCI DSS Requirement 3 is not intended to apply to individual account statements sent by issuing banks to cardholders. Full PAN displays in individual account statements are not required to be masked or rendered unreadable. The reference to "paper reports" in Requirement 3 is intended to apply to back-office reports and other internal paper reports that are not intended for distribution to individual cardholders.
With that said, Issuers should strongly consider masking or truncating PAN on any account statements, whether in paper or electronic form, as the presence of full PAN in addition to other information listed on account statements (such as name, address, telephone number, etc.) could provide a malicious individual with enough information to masquerade as the cardholder.
Issuers with a legitimate business need to display full PAN on account statements can do so, but may wish to contact the payment brands directly to discuss possible alternatives. Contact details for the payment brands can be found in FAQ 1142 - How do I contact the payment card brands?
Note: The specific sub requirement number(s) and terminology may vary depending on the version of the standard being used.
Related
-
How should PCI DSS v4.x requirements noted as superseded by another requirement be reported after 31 March 2025?
-
Are providers of third-party scripts for e-commerce environments considered third-party service providers for PCI DSS Requirements 12.8 and 12.9?
-
Why do requirements 8.3.9 and 8.3.10.1 focus on passwords/passphrases used for single-factor authentication, when multi-factor authentication is required for all access into the CDE?
Featured FAQ Articles
Featured
-
Do PCI DSS requirements for keyed cryptographic hashing apply to previously hashed PANs?
-
Is the PCI DSS Attestation of Compliance intended to be shared?
-
How does an entity report the results of a PCI DSS assessment for new requirements that are noted in PCI DSS as best practices until a future date?
-
Where do I direct questions about complying with PCI standards?
-
Can SAQ eligibility criteria be used for determining applicability of PCI DSS requirements for assessments documented in a Report on Compliance?
Most Popular
-
How should PCI DSS v4.x requirements noted as superseded by another requirement be reported after 31 March 2025?
-
Are providers of third-party scripts for e-commerce environments considered third-party service providers for PCI DSS Requirements 12.8 and 12.9?
-
Why do requirements 8.3.9 and 8.3.10.1 focus on passwords/passphrases used for single-factor authentication, when multi-factor authentication is required for all access into the CDE?
-
Do PCI DSS Requirements 8.3.9 and 8.3.10.1 apply to all system components?
-
Is the cardholder in scope for PCI DSS?
Most Recently Updated
-
How should PCI DSS v4.x requirements noted as superseded by another requirement be reported after 31 March 2025?
-
Are providers of third-party scripts for e-commerce environments considered third-party service providers for PCI DSS Requirements 12.8 and 12.9?
-
Why do requirements 8.3.9 and 8.3.10.1 focus on passwords/passphrases used for single-factor authentication, when multi-factor authentication is required for all access into the CDE?
-
Do PCI DSS Requirements 8.3.9 and 8.3.10.1 apply to all system components?
-
Is the cardholder in scope for PCI DSS?