Frequently Asked Question
How can an entity ensure that hashed and truncated versions cannot be correlated?
PCI DSS Requirement 3.5.1 states that if hashed and truncated versions of the same PAN, or different truncation formats, are present in the environment, additional controls must be implemented to prevent correlation.
The simplest solution is not to store both hashed and truncated PANs. If both must be retained, the following controls can help:
- Use of strong, unique, secret salts for hashing
- Separate storage systems for hashed and truncated values, isolated with segmentation, and distinct access controls
- Preventing cross-references or database links between values
- Real-time monitoring to detect correlation attempts
These are examples only. Controls should be suitable for the environment and ensure that full PAN reconstruction is not possible.
As per the guidance listed in PCI DSS implementing keyed cryptographic hashes with associated key management processes and procedures in accordance with Requirement 3.5.1.1 is a valid additional control to prevent correlation.
June 2025
Article Number: 1308
Related
-
What is the impact if an entity uses a third-party service provider (TPSP) to meet a PCI DSS requirement(s), when that TPSP’s PCI DSS assessment completion date is close to a year ago, as documented in the TPSP’s Attestation of Compliance (AOC)?
-
Are Approved Scanning Vendors and Qualified Security Assessors considered third-party service providers for PCI DSS Requirements 12.8 and 12.9?
-
What are the expectations for entities when assigning risk rankings to vulnerabilities and resolving or addressing those vulnerabilities?
Featured FAQ Articles
Featured
-
Do PCI DSS requirements for keyed cryptographic hashing apply to previously hashed PANs?
-
Is the PCI DSS Attestation of Compliance intended to be shared?
-
How does an entity report the results of a PCI DSS assessment for new requirements that are noted in PCI DSS as best practices until a future date?
-
Where do I direct questions about complying with PCI standards?
-
Can SAQ eligibility criteria be used as a guide for determining applicability of PCI DSS requirements for merchant assessments documented in a Report on Compliance?
Most Popular
-
What is the impact if an entity uses a third-party service provider (TPSP) to meet a PCI DSS requirement(s), when that TPSP’s PCI DSS assessment completion date is close to a year ago, as documented in the TPSP’s Attestation of Compliance (AOC)?
-
Are Approved Scanning Vendors and Qualified Security Assessors considered third-party service providers for PCI DSS Requirements 12.8 and 12.9?
-
What are the expectations for entities when assigning risk rankings to vulnerabilities and resolving or addressing those vulnerabilities?
-
Is phishing-resistant authentication alone acceptable as multi-factor authentication for PCI DSS Requirements 8.4.1 and 8.4.3?
-
Are passkeys synced across devices, implemented according to the FIDO2 requirements, acceptable for use as phishing-resistant authentication to meet PCI DSS Requirement 8.4.2?
Most Recently Updated
-
How do individuals obtain examination accommodation or adjustments for PCI SSC programs?
-
Are OEMs and/or hardware/software resellers considered third-party service providers for PCI DSS Requirements 12.8 and 12.9?
-
What is the purpose of PCI DSS Requirement 8.2.8, which requires users to reauthenticate after 15 minutes of idle time?
-
What is the impact if an entity uses a third-party service provider (TPSP) to meet a PCI DSS requirement(s), when that TPSP’s PCI DSS assessment completion date is close to a year ago, as documented in the TPSP’s Attestation of Compliance (AOC)?
-
To which types of service providers does PCI DSS Appendix A1 for Multi-Tenant Service Providers apply?